The Impact of Digital Inequality on Sustainability Education: Urban vs. Rural Divide
PDF
XML

Keywords

Digital Inequality
Sustainability Education
Rural-Urban Divide
Educational Equity
Literacy
Digital Access

How to Cite

The Impact of Digital Inequality on Sustainability Education: Urban vs. Rural Divide. (2026). Journal of Asiatic Society for Social Science Research, 8(1), 151-158. https://www.asssr.in/index.php/jasssr/article/view/316

Abstract

This qualitative research paper explores the impact of digital inequality on sustainability education in urban and rural education. This study based on the in-depth interview of 32 teachers and 48 students at eight schools (four urban, four rural) in three districts demonstrates that access to digital resources and the quality of the sustainability education delivery and engagement with the environmental ideas among students vary considerably. The results show that, although urban students enjoy the advantages of robust digital infrastructure that supports interactive sustainability programs, rural students have to grapple with significant challenges such as poor internet connectivity, obsolete technology and poor access to virtual environmental opportunities. Nevertheless, the countryside exhibits specific advantages of experiential and place-based sustainability education. The research ends with suggestions to address the digital divide and to capitalize on the unique strengths of each environment to improve sustainability education outcomes.

PDF
XML

References

1. Aada, K. 2024. “Perspective Chapter: Empowering Sustainable Development through Education—A Perspective on the Educational Landscape and Its Impact on Sustainability.” In Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1005076.

2. Adorno, D. P., E. A. Birsan, S. F. Stoica, M. Capatina, C. Cojocaru, A. Tzortzaki, Z. Štanfelj, Y. S. Dinçer, and N. Pizzolato. 2025. “Sustainability as a Cross-Curricular Link: Creative European Strategies for Eco-Conscious Environmental Education.” Sustainability 17 (11): 5193. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115193.

3. Anderson, Monica, and Madhumitha Kumar. 2019. “Digital Divide Persists Even as Lower-Income Americans Make Gains in Tech Adoption.” Pew Research Center 7: 1–18.

4. Ardoin, Nicole M., Alison W. Bowers, Nicholas W. Roth, and Nicole Holthuis. 2018. “Environmental Education and K–12 Student Outcomes: A Review and Analysis of Research.” The Journal of Environmental Education 49 (1): 1–17.

5. Balıkçı, H. C. 2005. Use of Technology in Sustainable Education: Examining Trends with Content Analysis.

6. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.

7. Chawla, Louise, and Debra Flanders Cushing. 2007. “Education for Strategic Environmental Behavior.” Environmental Education Research 13 (4): 437–52.

8. Coklar, Ahmet Naci, N. D. Yaman, and Ibrahim K. Yurdakul. 2017. “Information Literacy and Digital Nativity as Determinants of Online Information Search Strategies.” Computers in Human Behavior 70: 1–9.

9. Filho, Walter Leal, L. V. Trevisan, S. Sivapalan, M. Mazhar, A. Kounani, M. F. Mbah, I. R. Abubakar, N. R. Matandirotya, M. P. Dinis, B. Borsari, and R. Abzug. 2025. “Assessing the Impacts of Sustainability Teaching at Higher Education Institutions.” Discover Sustainability 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01024-z.

10. Greenwood, David A. 2013. “A Critical Theory of Place-Conscious Education.” In International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education, edited by Robert B. Stevenson, Michael Brody, Justin Dillon, and Arjen E. J. Wals, 90–100. New York: Routledge.

11. Gruenewald, David A., and Gregory A. Smith. 2008. Place-Based Education in the Global Age: Local Diversity. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

12. Johnson, Laura, and Paul Morris. 2010. “Towards a Framework for Critical Citizenship Education.” The Curriculum Journal 21 (1): 77–96.

13. Kahn, Richard, and Douglas Kellner. 2007. “Paulo Freire and Ivan Illich: Technology, Politics and the Reconstruction of Education.” Policy Futures in Education 5 (4): 431–48.

14. Kinnula, Marianne, Eva D. Gazulla, Noora Hirvonen, Jukka Malmberg, and Leena Haukipuro. 2024. “Nurturing Systems Thinking among Young People by Developing Business Ideas on Sustainable AI.” International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 40: 100656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100656.

15. Kollmuss, Anja, and Julian Agyeman. 2002. “Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior?” Environmental Education Research 8 (3): 239–60.

16. Louv, Richard. 2008. Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.

17. Mokski, E., Walter Leal Filho, S. Sehnem, and J. B. S. O. D. Andrade Guerra. 2023. “Education for Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions: An Approach for Effective Interdisciplinarity.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 24 (1): 96–117.

18. Monroe, Martha C., Richard R. Plate, Annie Oxarart, Alison Bowers, and Will A. Chaves. 2019. “Identifying Effective Climate Change Education Strategies: A Systematic Review of the Research.” Environmental Education Research 25 (6): 791–812.

19. Napal, María, Ana M. Mendióroz-Lacambra, and Alicia Peñalva. 2020. “Sustainability Teaching Tools in the Digital Age.” Sustainability 12 (8): 3366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083366.

20. Norris, Pippa. 2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21. Park, Y. 2024. “Sustainable Education Practices: Voices from Higher Education Institutions.” Research Square: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3923563/v1.

22. Powers, Amy L. 2004. “An Evaluation of Four Place-Based Education Programs.” The Journal of Environmental Education 35 (4): 17–32.

23. Rap, S., and M. Bodas. 2024. “Innovate for Impact: Young Adults Education and Empowerment for Climate Action.” Australian Journal of Environmental Education 40 (4): 784–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2024.46.

24. Reich, Justin, and Mizuko Ito. 2017. From Good Intentions to Real Outcomes: Equity by Design in Learning Technologies. Irvine, CA: DML Central.

25. Rust, B., and S. Rust. 2024. “Place-Based Innovation for Sustainable and Resilient Human Systems.” Sustainable Earth Reviews 7 (1): 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-024-00089-4.

26. Schulte, B. 2002. “Teachers and Techno Literacy: A Study of a Professional Development Program.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 10 (4): 593–615.

27. Selwyn, Neil. 2010. “Looking beyond Learning: Notes towards the Critical Study of Educational Technology.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26 (1): 65–73.

28. Sobel, David. 2004. Place-Based Education: Connecting Classrooms and Communities. Great Barrington, MA: The Orion Society.

29. Stern, Marc J., Robert B. Powell, and Dawn Hill. 2014. “Environmental Education Program Evaluation in the New Millennium: What Do We Measure and What Have We Learned?” Environmental Education Research 20 (5): 581–611.

30. Stevenson, Robert B., Michael Brody, Justin Dillon, and Arjen E. J. Wals, eds. 2013. International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education. New York: Routledge.

31. Truelove, Heather B., Amanda R. Carrico, and Lanka Thabrew. 2015. “A Socio-Psychological Model for Analyzing Climate Change Adaptation: A Case Study of Sri Lankan Paddy Farmers.” Global Environmental Change 31: 85–97.

32. UNESCO. 2017. Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

33. Van Dijk, Jan A. G. M. 2006. “Digital Divide Research Achievements and Shortcomings.” Poetics 34 (4–5): 221–35.

34. Warschauer, Mark, and Tina Matuchniak. 2010. “New Technology and Digital Worlds: Analyzing Evidence of Equity in Access, Use and Outcomes.” Review of Research in Education 34 (1): 179–225.

35. Wells, Nancy M., and Kristi S. Lekies. 2006. “Nature and the Life Course: Pathways from Childhood Nature Experiences to Adult Environmentalism.” Children, Youth and Environments 16 (1): 1–24.

36. Zheng, Yingqin, and Geoff Walsham. 2008. “Inequality of What? Social Exclusion in the E-Society as Capability Deprivation.” Information Technology & People 21 (3): 222–43.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Dr Amarnath Das, Ranajit Dhara (Author)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.