Abstract
This article examines continuity and change in mortuary practices during the Neolithic–Iron Age transition in Karnataka. Neolithic burials are generally simple, including pit and urn burials with limited grave goods, while Iron Age Megalithic burials show more complex structures and richer material remains. Evidence from sites such as Hallur, Brahmagiri, and Maski suggests both continuity and transformation. While some earlier traditions continued, new burial forms reflect increasing social complexity. The study argues that the transition was gradual rather than abrupt.
References
1. Allchin, F. R., and Bridget Allchin. 1982. The Rise of Civilization in India and Pakistan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Johansen, Peter G. 2004. “Landscape, Monumentality and the Iron Age in Southern India.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 23: 313–338.
3. Korisettar, Ravi. 1998. “Neolithic–Iron Age Transition.” Puratattva 28.
4. Moorti, U. S. 1994. Megalithic Culture of South India.
5. Paddayya, K. 1991. “The Neolithic Culture of South India.” Man and Environment 16: 1–18.
6. Paddayya, K., and V. Shinde. n.d. “Neolithic Settlement at Hallur.”
7. Rajan, K. 1991. Megalithic Culture of South India. New Delhi: Manohar.
8. Sundara, A. 1982. “Early Iron Age in Karnataka.” Man and Environment.
9. Wheeler, Mortimer. 1948. Brahmagiri and Chandravalli 1947. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.
10. “Social Distinctions during the South Indian Neolithic: Maski Study.” n.d. Antiquity.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ranadhir Sikdar (Author)
