Keywords
Global South
Post-Development
Post-Structuralism
Post-Colonialism
Power
How to Cite
Abstract
During the past forty years, international political economy has emerged as one of the most prominent and remarkable field of study in the discipline of International Relations which has turned the attention of scholars to a number of new frontiers of research such as financial markets, global governance, international organizations, global firms and production, economic regionalism, the North-South divide and most significantly the issue of development. The issue of development is one of those issues which have increasingly gained the attention of the researchers and academicians due to the emergence of international political economy. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to understand the issues and debates which are centered around the development discourse of last two or three decades especially because now development has become one of the prevalent factor which driven the contemporary world politics. It could be also argue that without taking development into account, the study and understanding of international political economy including domestic and international political events will be incomplete, limited or partial. Apart from that, this paper aims to offer critical perspectives on the development thinking of present time. This paper starts with the general understanding of development and the problems which emerged from this understanding. The paper also provides a brief summary of different meanings of development and the fundamental critiques of mainstream development from the perspective known as post-structuralism. Furthermore, this paper intends to explore the ways in which post-development critique can offer insights into alternatives to development.
References
1. Dasgupta, S. 1985. Towards a Post-Development Era. London: Mittal.
2. Escobar, Arturo. 1985. “Discourse and Power in Development: Michel Foucault and the Relevance of His Work to the Third World.” Alternatives, 377–400.
3. —. 1991. “Anthropology and the Development Encounter: The Making and Marketing of Development Anthropology.” American Ethnologist 18 (4): 658–682.
4. —. 1992. “Reflections on ‘Development’: Grassroots Approaches and Alternative Politics in the Third World.” Futures 24: 411–436.
5. —. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. —. 1996. “Imagining a Post-Development Era.” In The Power of Development, edited by Jonathan Crush. London: Routledge.
7. Esteva, Gustavo. 1992. “Development.” In The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power, edited by Wolfgang Sachs. London: Zed Books.
8. Friedmann, John. 1992. Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Kothari, Rajni. 1988. Rethinking Development: In Search of Humane Alternatives. Delhi: Ajanta.
10. Nederveen Pieterse, Jan. 1991. “Dilemmas of Development Discourse: The Crisis of Developmentalism and the Comparative Method.” Development and Change 22 (1): 5–29.
11. —. 1998. “My Paradigm or Yours? Alternative Development, Post-Development, Reflexive Development.” Development and Change 29 (2): 343–373.
12. —. 2000. “After Post-Development.” Third World Quarterly 20 (1): 175–191.
13. Rahnema, Majid. 1997. “Towards Post-Development: Searching for Signposts, a New Language, and a New Paradigm.” In The Post-Development Reader, edited by Majid Rahnema and Victoria Bawtree, 377–404. London: Zed Books.
14. Rahnema, Majid, and Victoria Bawtree, eds. 1997. The Post-Development Reader. London: Zed Books.
15. Rist, Gilbert. 1990. “Development as the New Religion of the West.” Quid Pro Quo 1 (2): 5–8.
16. Sachs, Wolfgang, ed. 1992. The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books.
17. Shiva, Vandana. 1988. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. London: Zed Books.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 JASSSR