Abstract
In India, the relationship between puppets and their puppeteers is deeply rooted in both tradition and the act of storytelling. For Indian puppeteers, puppetry is not merely an enactment where inanimate objects are manipulated to narrate a story; it indeed reflects a symbiotic relationship where the puppet and the puppeteer are intimately linked through a common creative experience. In many traditional Indian puppet forms, and especially in Putul Naach of Bengal with which this paper is specifically concerned, the puppet itself ceases to remain just an extension of the puppeteer with a borrowed voice. However, when seen through the lens of New Materialism and Thing Theory, one may argue that the puppet possesses an inherent agency, whether it is through its design, materiality, or the stories it relates that need to be heard. The puppeteer, therefore, is not a master controlling the puppet but also a medium or a liminal entity through which the puppet’s own materiality and individuality comes to life. This interconnectedness between the object and its manipulator portrays a deeper cultural belief where the line between the animate and inanimate often blurs, carving a space for both to co-exist and co-create meaning within the context of performance. Also, by analysing the puppet as a "thing," we move beyond the idea of the puppet as a mere medium through which the performer communicates a story. Instead, the puppet itself assumes the role of an active participant in shaping the narrative. With the use of the aforementioned theoretical frameworks and the concept of the sutradhar in Bengal puppetry, this paper attempts to probe into the question of how the puppet becomes a form of agency that challenges and subverts the hierarchical understanding of power dynamics which is otherwise thought to be traditionally entrenched in this theatrical form.
References
1. Alaimo, Stacy. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2. Appadurai, Arjun, ed. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Banerjee, Mandakranta. 2012. Raslila Performances in Bengal: Tradition and Innovation. Kolkata: Seagull Press.
4. Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5. Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6. Bhowmick, Anirban. 2019. Embodied Puppetry: Material Agency in Bengal’s Putul Naach. Kolkata: Jadavpur University Press.
7. Bose, Mandakranta. 2014. Puppets and Narrative Adaptation in Bengal. New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan.
8. Brown, Bill. 2001. Thing Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Carlson, Marvin. 1993. Theories of the Theatre: A Historical and Critical Survey from the Greeks to the Present. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10. Chakrabarty, Sudip. 2011. Puppets of Bengal: Performance, Materiality, and Agency. Kolkata: Rabindra Bharati University Press.
11. Chatterjee, Arindam. 2015. Audience, Agency, and Puppets: Ethnographies of Putul Naach. New Delhi: Primus Books.
12. Chattopadhyay, Ranjit. 2003. The Historical Sutra-dhar of Bengali Theatre. Kolkata: Dasgupta Publications.
13. Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost, eds. 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
14. Das, Priyanka. 2017. Performing Divinity: Rituals and Puppets in Eastern India. Kolkata: Seagull Press.
15. Das Gupta, Shreya. 2018. Sutradhar and Agency in Putul Naach: Reconsidering the Puppet Master. Kolkata: Jadavpur University Press.
16. Daston, Lorraine. 1988. Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Majumdar, Subhas. 2016. Mechanical Artistry in Rod Puppetry of Bengal. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
18. Mitra, Anup. 2012. Material Transformations in Putul Naach Puppets. Kolkata: Seagull Press.
19. Mukherjee, Arup. 2015. Crafting the Puppet: Materiality and Expressivity in Bengal. Kolkata: Jadavpur University Press.
20. Richmond, Farah. 2008. The Narrative Threads: Control and Mediation in Theatre Traditions. New Delhi: Routledge India.
21. Roy, Ipsita. 2014. Village Audiences and Puppetry: Experiencing Material Agency. Kolkata: Seagull Press.
22. Sarkar, Kalyan. 2016. Rituals of Puppetry: Life, Consecration, and Performance in Bengal. Kolkata: Rabindra Bharati University Press.
23. Schechner, Richard. 1985. Between Theater and Anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
24. Schwenger, Peter. 2006. The Tears of Things: Melancholy and Physical Objects. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
25. Turner, Victor. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr Archita Banerjee (Author)
