Rethinking Power through the Lens of Popular Culture: Comparative Analysis of 18th century French Clandestine Literature and 19th century Bengali Folk Culture
PDF
XML

Keywords

Popular Culture
Bengali Folk
French Clandestine
Literature
British India
Resistance

How to Cite

Rethinking Power through the Lens of Popular Culture: Comparative Analysis of 18th century French Clandestine Literature and 19th century Bengali Folk Culture. (2026). Journal of Asiatic Society for Social Science Research, 8(1), 567-580. https://www.asssr.in/index.php/jasssr/article/view/242

Abstract

The paper highlights how the "popular" folk performance tradition in 19th century colonial Bengal and clandestine writing in 18th century France both served as vehicles for social critique and subversion. Clandestine literature developed as a critique of absolutist rule and ecclesiastical authority in pre-revolutionary France, while popular folk performances of Bengal addressed the socio-economic and cultural disparities that were sustained under British colonial rule. These two genres of culture emerged within different but comparable contexts of political and cultural upheaval. In order to reach underprivileged and disenfranchised audiences, both mediums strategically used humor, allegory, and easily accessible distribution channels to get over censorship and repression mechanisms. The study examines the form and content of these practices using performative and textual analysis. Selected libelles, philosophical, and satirical pamphlet examples are examined for their subjects, language, and use of satire to criticize the king and clergy in order to determine clandestine literature. To learn how comedy, allegory, and vernacular traditions criticize British colonial power and local elites (babu); folk performances, scripts, lyrics, and performance descriptions are analyzed. The paper also looks at how audiences absorbed and understood these cultural manifestations, highlighting how they promoted group resistance. This will be done on the basis of secondary literature available through travel reports of the period. In case of clandestine literature, the focus is on reading, covert distribution networks, and the texts' impact on revolutionary ideas. In colonial Bengal, the popular folk performative qualities, ability to connect with rural and semi-urban inhabitants, and function in fostering community awareness and solidarity are highlighted.

PDF
XML

References

1. Archer, W. G. 1953. Bazaar Paintings of Calcutta: The Style of Kalighat. Victoria and Albert Museum Monograph 7. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

2. Bandopadhyay, Brajendranath. 1938. Sangbad Patrikar Sekaler Kotha. Vol. 1. Kolkata: Bangiya Sahitya Parishad.

3. Banerjee, Sumanta. 1989. The Parlour and the Streets: Elite and Popular Culture in Nineteenth-Century Calcutta. Calcutta: Seagull Books.

4. Burrows, Simon. 2015. “Charmet and the Book Police: Clandestinity, Illegality and Popular Reading in Late Ancien Régime France.” In French History and Civilization, vol. 6, 2014 Seminar Papers, edited by J. Kalman, 34–55. Sydney: George Rudé Society and H-France.

5. Calcutta Review. 1853. Vol. 21. Calcutta.

6. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

7. Chartier, Roger. 1991. The Cultural Origins of the French Revolution. Translated by Lydia G. Cochrane. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

8. Curran, Michael. 2018. The French Book Trade in Enlightenment Europe, Volume I: Selling Enlightenment. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

9. Darnton, Robert. 1989. “The Forbidden Bestsellers of Prerevolutionary France.” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 43 (1): 17–45.

10. Darnton, Robert. 2000. “An Early Information Society: News and the Media in Eighteenth-Century Paris.” American Historical Review 105 (1): 1–35.

11. Dey, P. C. 1940. “Kolikata Baghbajarer Pracheen Itihas.” Desh, January 20.

12. Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25/26: 56–80.

13. Grübel, Rainer. 2022. “Carnival, Carnivalism and Bakhtin’s Culture of Laughter.” In Bakhtin and Cultural Theory. DOI: 10.1515/9783110400304-047.

14. Guha, Ranajit. 1983. Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

15. Habermas, Jürgen, Sara Lennox, and Frank Lennox. 1974. “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article (1964).” New German Critique 3: 49–55.

16. Hall, Stuart. 1980. “Encoding/Decoding.” In Culture, Media, Language, edited by Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe, and Paul Willis, 128–138. London: Hutchinson.

17. Harmon, Gary L. 1983. “On the Nature and Functions of Popular Culture.” Studies in Popular Culture 6: 3–15.

18. Hunt, Lynn. 2007. Inventing Human Rights: A History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

19. Laursen, John Christian. 2020. “Afterword.” In Clandestine Philosophy: New Studies on Subversive Manuscripts in Early Modern Europe, 1620–1823, edited by Gianni Paganini, Margaret C. Jacob, and John Christian Laursen, 397–404. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

20. Levine, Lawrence W. 1988. Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

21. Little, David. 1993. Review of Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, by James C. Scott. Political Theory 21 (1): 153–156.

22. Maase, Kaspar. 2017. “Popular Culture, ‘Resistance,’ ‘Cultural Radicalism,’ and ‘Self-Formation.’” In Subjects, Representations, Contexts, 45–65. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

23. Mairobert, Mathieu François Pidansat de. 1779. Letters to and from the Countess Du Barry. 2nd ed. London: G. Kearsly.

24. Majumdar, S. 2022. “Folk Performances and the European Gaze in Bengal.” Linguaculture 13 (2): 35–50.

25. Mukherjee, A. 2020. “Kalighat Paintings.” Chitrolekha Journal on Art and Design 4 (1).

26. Mukhopadhyay, Durgadas, ed. 1978. Lesser Known Forms of Performing Arts in India. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.

27. Oddie, Geoffrey A. 2006. Imagined Hinduism: British Protestant Missionary Constructions of Hinduism, 1793–1900. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

28. Paganini, Gianni. 2020. “Introduction: What Is a Clandestine Philosophical Manuscript?” In Clandestine Philosophy: New Studies on Subversive Manuscripts in Early Modern Europe, 1620–1823, 3–19. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

29. Pandit, M. 2013. “Swadeshi Jatra Performances in Bengal (1905–1911): Locating the Ground for Engendering a Nuanced National Identity in South Asia.” Societal Studies 5 (1): 121–136.

30. Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.

31. Sandeman, H. D., ed. 1869. Selections from the Calcutta Gazette, 1816–1823. Vol. 5. Calcutta.

32. Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

33. Seguin, Sylvie. 2020. “Philosophical Clandestine Literature and Academic Circles in France.” In Clandestine Philosophy: New Studies on Subversive Manuscripts in Early Modern Europe, 1620–1823, 245–259. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

34. Seth, H. 1934. Pracheen Kolikata. Calcutta.

35. Williams, Raymond. 1983. Culture and Society, 1780–1950. Rev. ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Kamalika Das (Author)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.